sábado, junio 15, 2024
Journal of International Dispute Settlement - Volume 11, Issue 3, September 2020

Journal of International Dispute Settlement – Volume 11, Issue 3, September 2020

jnlids 11 3cover

Journal of International Dispute Settlement

Volume 11, Issue 3, September 2020

ISSN: 2040-3585, EISSN: 2040-3593

Since the 1980s, a radical development has taken place in international dispute settlement. The number of international courts, tribunals and other international dispute resolution mechanisms has increased dramatically. The number of international disputes resolved by such means has risen in even greater proportions. These disputes more and more frequently raise issues that combine private and public international law, effectively bringing back to light the deep-seated interactions that have always existed between these two traditional fields of academic study. The regulatory impact of certain branches of international dispute settlement – such as international arbitration – further create the need to take a step back and think about where we are going. The growth of the field of international dispute settlement in practice, the novelty and significance of the issues posed, and the originality of the academic angle from which such issues need to be addressed are the factors that triggered the launch of the Journal of International Dispute Settlement.


Indian Princely States and the 19th-century Transformation of the Law of Nations
Prabhakar Singh

The Missing Elephant in the Room—the Jurisdiction of International Human Rights Tribunals over International Humanitarian Law
Ka Lok Yip

The Singapore Convention: Towards a Universal Standard for the Recognition and Enforcement of International Settlement Agreements?
Clemens Treichl

The Missing Reading of the Parable: Comment on ‘The Twelfth Camel, or the Economics of Justice’, by F Ost [(2011) 2(2) J Int Disp Settlement 333–51]Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi

Current Developments
Judges ad hoc and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: An Overview of its Practice
Sandrine De Herdt

Keeping with the Times, Revisiting the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Gracious Timothy Dunna

The Tribunal with a Toolbox: On Perenco v Ecuador, Black Gold and Shades of Green
Jason Rudall

Ver también

Nicolas Boeglin

Gaza / Israël : à propos de la déclaration de la Palestine reconnaissant la compétence de la CIJ et demandant à intervenir en l’affaire Afrique du Sud contre Israël

Nicolas Boeglin, professeur de droit international public, Faculté de droit, Université du Costa Rica (UCR). …