Derecho Internacional Público – dipublico.org Cátedra I de Derecho Internacional Público de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad Católica de La Plata – Argentina

Los Estados Parte en el presente Convenio, Reafirmando su convicción de que el comercio internacional basado en la igualdad y el provecho mutuo constituye un factor importante en orden al fomento de las relaciones amistosas entre los Estados, Convencidos de que la armonización y unificación progresivas del derecho mercantil internacional, …

Los Estados Partes en el presente Convenio, Conscientes de la necesidad de mejorar las condiciones de financiación de los buques y el desarrollo de las flotas mercantes nacionales, Reconociendo la conveniencia de uniformidad internacional en la esfera de los privilegios marítimos y la hipoteca naval, y por ende Convencidos de …

PREÁMBULO Los Estados Partes en el presente Convenio, HABIENDO RECONOCIDO la conveniencia de fijar de común acuerdo ciertas reglas relativas al transporte marítimo de mercancías, HAN DECIDIDO celebrar un convenio a esos efectos y han acordado lo siguiente: PARTE I. DISPOSICIONES GENERALES Artículo 1. Definiciones En el presente Convenio: 1. …

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) – 8 October 2007 JUDGMENT PRESENT: PRESIDENT Higgins; VICE-PRESIDENT Al-Khasawneh; JUDGES Ranjeva, Shi, Koroma, Parra-Aranguren, Buergenthal, Owada, Simma, Tomka, Abraham, Keith, Sepulveda-Amor, Bennouna, Skotnikov; JUDGES AD HOC Torres Bernardez, …

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 1988 20 December General List No. 74 CASE CONCERNING BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS 20 December 1988 (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) JURISDICTION OF THE COURT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE APPLICATION Jurisdiction of the Court, burden ofproof— Intention of the Parties. Charter of Organization ofAmerican States — Pact …

COURT OF APPEAL The judges of the Court of Appeal have agreed as follows: I. With regard to the case file No. 16/PID.C.G./2001/PD.DIL, from the Special Panel for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court, the following entities have appealed to the Court of Appeal: 1st- The Public Prosecution Service, …

U.S. Supreme Court Arkansas v. Tennessee, 246 U.S. 158 (1918) Arkansas v. Tennessee No. 4, Original Argued October 9, 1917 Decided March 4, 1918 246 U.S. 158 I N EQUITY Syllabus When two states of the Union are separated by a navigable stream, their boundary being described as “a line …

ARGENTINE — CHILE FRONTIER CASE [1] PARTIES: Argentine, Chile COMPROMIS: Agreement of 1st April, 1965 [2] ARBITRATOR: Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [3] AWARD: 9 December, 1966 REPORT OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION: 24 November, 1966 Delimitation of certain portions of the …

CASE CONCERNING THE ARBITRAL AWARD MADE BY THE KING OF SPAIN ON 23 DECEMBER 1906 (HONDURAS v. NICARAGUA) Arbitration.—Contention that arbitrator not regularly designated and Award a nullity.—Acceptance of designation of arbitrator and of Award.—Grounds of nullity invoked.—Executability of Award. JUDGMENT Present: President Klaestad; Vice-President Zafrulla Khan; Judges Hackworth, Winiarski, …

OCTOBER TERM, 1991 Syllabus REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA ET AL. v. WELTOVER, INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 91-763. Argued April 1, 1992-Decided June 12, 1992 As part of a plan to stabilize petitioner Argentina’s currency, that country and petitioner bank …