miércoles, febrero 21, 2024
International Journal of Constitutional Law - Volume 20, Issue 2, April 2022

International Journal of Constitutional Law – Volume 20, Issue 2, April 2022

International Journal of Constitutional Law - Volume 20, Issue 2, April 2022

International Journal of Constitutional Law

Volume 20, Issue 2, April 2022

ISSN: 1474-2640, EISSN: 1474-2659

Published in association with the New York University School of Law, I•CON is dedicated to advancing the study of international and comparative constitutional law in the broadest sense of the terms.

I•CON recognizes that the boundaries between the disciplines of “constitutional law”, “administrative law”, “international law” and their comparative variants have become increasingly porous. So too, there is no longer a distinct divide between law and political science. I•CON scholarship reflects and values this intellectual cross-fertilization.

I•CON‘s interests include not only fields such as Administrative Law, Global Constitutional Law and Global Administrative Law, but also scholarship that reflects both legal reality and academic perception; scholarship which, in dealing with the challenges of public life and governance, combines elements from all of these fields with a good measure of political theory and social science.

Featuring scholarly articles by international and constitutional legal scholars, judges, and people from related fields, such as economics, philosophy and political science, I•CON offers critical analysis of current issues, debates and global trends that carry constitutional implications.

CONTENIDO

Editorial
Altneueland – European Law Open published by Cambridge University Press: Welcome

Editorial Reflection
On scholactivism in constitutional studies: Skeptical thoughts
Tarunabh Khaitan

Letters to the Editors
Reflecting on the ethical commitments of our role
Thomas Bustamante

“Scholarship is about knowledge, not justice”
Jan Komárek

Constitutional scholars and scholactivism
Liora Lazarus

“Knowledge comes with responsibility”: Why academic ivory towerism can’t be the answer to legal scholactivism
Alberto Alemanno

Articles
Rousseau’s illiberal constitutionalism: Austerity, domination, and the circumstances of politics
Eoin Daly

Constitutional design for dynamic democracies: A framework for analysis
Zim Nwokora

Feminist constitutionalism: Mapping a discourse in contestation
Shreya Atrey

Necessity or balancing: The protection of rights under different proportionality tests—Experimental evidence
Talya Steiner, Liat Netzer, Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan

The gatekeepers: Executive lawyers and the executive power in comparative constitutional law
Conor Casey, David Kenny

Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America
Gabriel Pereira

Constitutionalism and the radical right: The case of the Spanish party Vox
Pablo Castillo-Ortiz

Para-constitutional engineering and federalism: Informal constitutional change through intergovernmental agreements
Johanne Poirier, Jesse Hartery

Explaining continuity and change: The case of the Euratom Treaty
Anna Södersten

Critical Review of Governance
What establishment expresses
Farrah Ahmed

Critical Review of Jurisprudence
Constitutional review of negotiated international investment agreements: Strengths and shortcomings of the Colombian Constitutional Court’s approach
Juan Carlos Ochoa-Sánchez

Constitutional identity, expressivism, and constitutional change through judicial interpretation: The Indonesian LGBT case as a case study
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha

I•CON: Debate!
“Constitutional dismemberment” and the problem of pragmatism in Siddiqui: A reply to Po Jen Yap and Rehan Abeyratne
M A Sayeed, Lima Aktar

Constitutional dismemberments, basic structure doctrine, and pragmatic justifications in context: A rejoinder
Rehan Abeyratne, Po Jen Yap

Book Reviews
Shun-Ling Chen, Review of Joshua C. Gellers, Rights for Robots: Artificial Intelligence, Animal and Environmental Law
Shun-Ling Chen

Erin F. Delaney, Review of Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart.
Erin F Delaney

Leah Trueblood, Review of Ron Levy, Ian O’Flynn, and Hoi L. Kong, Deliberative Peace Referendums
Leah Trueblood

Bryan Dennis G. Tiojanco, Review of Reo Matsuzaki, Statebuilding by Imposition: Resistance and Control in Colonial Taiwan and the Philippines
Bryan Dennis G Tiojanco

Robert Poll, Review of Zaid Al-Ali, Arab Constitutionalism: The Coming Revolution
Robert Poll

Ver también

CASO RELATIVO A CIERTAS TIERRAS FOSFÁTICAS EN NAURU (NAURU CONTRA AUSTRALIA) (EXCEPCIONES PRELIMINARES) – Fallo de 26 de junio de 1992 – Corte Internacional de Justicia

CASO RELATIVO A CIERTAS TIERRAS FOSFÁTICAS EN NAURU (NAURU CONTRA AUSTRALIA) (EXCEPCIONES PRELIMINARES) Nauru v. …