viernes, junio 14, 2024
Journal of International Dispute Settlement - Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2019

Journal of International Dispute Settlement – Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2019

jnlids 10 4cover

Journal of International Dispute Settlement

Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2019

ISSN: 2040-3585, EISSN: 2040-3593

Since the 1980s, a radical development has taken place in international dispute settlement. The number of international courts, tribunals and other international dispute resolution mechanisms has increased dramatically. The number of international disputes resolved by such means has risen in even greater proportions. These disputes more and more frequently raise issues that combine private and public international law, effectively bringing back to light the deep-seated interactions that have always existed between these two traditional fields of academic study. The regulatory impact of certain branches of international dispute settlement – such as international arbitration – further create the need to take a step back and think about where we are going. The growth of the field of international dispute settlement in practice, the novelty and significance of the issues posed, and the originality of the academic angle from which such issues need to be addressed are the factors that triggered the launch of the Journal of International Dispute Settlement.


International Dispute Settlement Reconstructed, and Reconstructed Again: 10 Years of JIDS
Thomas Schultz

Current Developments
Why Allianz v West Tankers Still Applies under the Brussels Regulation (Recast): An Analysis of Nori Holdings v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm)
Serena Lee, Myron Phua

Reforming Judicial Supervision of Chinese Arbitration
Meng Chen

The Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Bringing the Findings of Social Psychology into the Debate
Myriam Gicquello

Studying Country-Specific Engagements with the International Court of Justice
Margaret A Young, Emma Nyhan, Hilary Charlesworth

Functional Justiciability and the Existence of a Dispute: A Means of Jurisdictional Avoidance?
Manuel Casas

The Problem with Public Morals
Caroline E Foster


Ver también

Compañía Eléctrica de Sofía y Bulgaria (Medidas Provisionales) (Resúmenes de los fallos, opiniones consultivas y providencias de la Corte Permanente de Justicia Internacional)

Orden de 5 de diciembre de 1939 (Serie A/B, nº 79) Decimosexto Informe Anual de …