Journal of International Economic Law – Volume 22, Issue 3, September 2019
Volume 22, Issue 3, September 2019
ISSN: 1369-3034, EISSN: 1464-3758
The Journal of International Economic Law is dedicated to encouraging thoughtful and scholarly attention to a very broad range of subjects that concern the relation of law to international economic activity, by providing the major English language medium for publication of high-quality manuscripts relevant to the endeavours of scholars, government officials, legal professionals, and others.
The journal’s emphasis is on fundamental, long-term, systemic problems and possible solutions, in the light of empirical observations and experience, as well as theoretical and multi-disciplinary approaches. It provides important critiques of policies, negotiations, or court and tribunal cases and contribute modestly to promoting peace, world welfare, and enhancement of the quality of life for all peoples.
The editorial board is multi-national and not tied to any particular jurisdiction.
The views expressed in the articles, editorial comments, book reviews and notes, and other contributions to the Journal of International Economic Law are those of the individual authors and are not to be taken as representing the views of the board of editors, the board of editorial advisors, rapporteurs, or Oxford University Press.
WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect?
Trade and Women—Opportunities for Women in the Framework of the World Trade Organization
Rohini Acharya, Olga Falgueras Alamo, Salma Mohamed Thabit Al-Battashi, Anoush der Boghossian, Naghm Ghei …
To fuse, Not to Fuse, or Simply Confuse? Assessing the Case for Normative Convergence Between Goods and Services Trade Law
Greening the WTO Environmental Goods Agreement, Tariff Concessions, and Policy Likeness
Petros C Mavroidis, Damien J Neven
Regulating Cross-Border Data Flows in a Data-Driven World: How WTO Law Can Contribute
Andrew D Mitchell, Neha Mishra
Subsidies for Illegal Activities?—Reframing IUU Fishing from the Law Enforcement Perspective
Are Retaliatory Trade Measures Justified under the WTO Agreement on Safeguards?
Challenging Unwritten Measures in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Clear Legal Standards
Cherise Valles, Vitaliy Pogoretskyy, Tatiana Yanguas
Towards a Coherent Theory of Panel Recommendations for Expired Measures
The CETA Opinion of the European Court of Justice and its Implications—Not that Selfish After All
China’s International Investment Strategy: Bilateral, Regional, and Global Law and Policy
Binh Duong Nguyen
TagsARTICLES book Book Reviews Case Cherise Valles Christian Riffel EISSN European Court of Justice International Economic Law Jaemin Lee Joost Pauwelyn Neha Mishra Olga Falgueras Alamo Oxford Oxford University Press Policy Likeness Prakhar Bhardwaj Rohini Acharya Simply Confuse Tatiana Yanguas
Arbitration International Volume 37, Issue 3, September 2021 ISSN: 0957-0411, EISSN: 1875-8398 @LCIAnews @OUPAcademic The …